Low-Fat Eaters Burned Fewer Calories, Were More Likely to Regain Lost Weight
June 26, 2012 — New research challenges the idea that a calorie is a calorie, suggesting that certain foods and diets may be better than others for burning calories and helping people maintain weight loss.
The study appears this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Study participants who had lost weight concurred to follow low-fat, very-low-carb, and low-glycemic-index diets for a month each.
Calories Not Equal, Researcher Says
The very-low-carb plan and the low-glycemic-index plan — which stresses a variety of high fiber and minimally processed foods — also resulted in better insulin sensitivity (necessary to process blood sugar effectively) and cholesterol levels.
This suggests that very-low-fat diets may actually slow a person’s metabolism down to a level where it is not burning calories as effectively as it could, states researcher David S. Ludwig, MD, PhD, who directs the Optimal Weight for Life program at the Harvard-affiliated Children’s Hospital in Boston.
Ludwig has long studied the low-glycemic-index diet and is one of the diet’s main proponents.
“From a metabolic perspective our study suggests that all calories are not alike,” Ludwig tells WebMD. “The quality of the calories going in is going to affect the number of calories going out.”
Different Diets, Different Outcomes
The study included 21 young adults who originally lost 10% to 15% of their body weight on a diet that included 45% carbohydrates, 30% fats, and 25% protein.
During the course of the study, the participants followed three different diets for a month each, including:
A low-fat diet, which included mostly whole grains, fruits, and vegetables, where 60% of daily calories came from carbohydrates, 20% from fats, and 20% from protein. A low-glycemic-index diet, which included minimally processed grains, vegetables, legumes, and healthy fats, where 40% of calories came from carbohydrates, 40% from fat, and 20% from protein. A very-low-carb diet, modeled after the Atkins plan, where 10% of calories came from carbohydrates, 60% from fats, and 30% from protein.
The study participants ate about 1,600 calories a day on each of the diets and the amount of calories burned was measured using state-of-the-art methods.
The testing confirms that they burned about 300 calories more a day when following the very-low-carb eating plan compared to the low-fat plan, and about 150 calories more on the low-glycemic index diet compared to the low-fat plan.
“The ideal diet from a metabolic perspective was the low-carbohydrate diet, but there were downsides,” Ludwig says.
- Astellas, Ambit announce results from quizartinib Phase 2 study on acute myeloid leukemia
- Impact of Medicaid expansion would vary by state, according to study
- Fish, But Not Fish Oil Supplements, May Shield Against Stroke
- Antidepressant eases radiation-related mouth pain in head, neck cancer
- Study: More Birth Defects with In Vitro
- Antidepressants and Stroke
- Vaccine Safety
- Children and CT Concerns
- Study: Hint of Benefit for Alzheimer’s Drug
- Study provides direct evidence for persistent activity in medial entorhinal cortex layer neurons
Submited at Wednesday, June 27th, 2012 at 8:15 am on Uncategorized by Gillan
Comment RSS 2.0 - leave a comment - trackback