ScienceDaily (July 21, 2012) Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and Makerere University in Uganda have used hair and blood samples from three-month old infants born to HIV-positive moms to measure the uninfected babies’ exposure — both in the womb and from breast-feeding — to antiretroviral medications their moms were taking. The results, they said, are surprising.
“We found high levels of exposure to three antiretroviral medications in the hair samples of HIV uninfected infants at twelve weeks of life,” stated study senior author, Monica Gandhi, MD, MPH, associate professor of medicine at the UCSF Division of HIV/AIDS at San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (SFGH).
“From looking at plasma level data at the same time point, we believe that transfer of two of the medicines from mom to baby occurs exclusively in the womb and transfer of the third medication occurs both in the womb and through breastfeeding.”
The findings could lead to new ways to protect infants from HIV transmission and to better comprehend the development of toxicities and resistance to the drugs, the researchers said.
A single plasma level of a medication reflects drug exposure over approximately 24 hours. Measuring the concentrations of antiretrovirals in a small hair sample reveals exposure over the past month. The team therefore measured both plasma and hair levels of medications in babies whose moms were taking HIV medications to get a better idea of when drugs are being passed from mom to baby. “Since fetuses begin growing hair in the womb, hair sampling gives us an opportunity to analyze exposures to drug before birth,” stated Gandhi.
UCSF researchers have pioneered the use of hair sampling for measuring antiretroviral levels. The procedure is now a standard measure in many research studies, equivalent in HIV clinical care to measuring hemoglobin A1C to monitor average blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes.
In the study, the team took hair and blood samples from two groups of HIV-positive mothers, all of whom breast-fed their infants. For 45 mother/infant pairs, the mothers’ antiretroviral regimens included a protease inhibitor, lopinavir, boosted by ritonavir, another antiretroviral medication. The other 64 moms were on an efavirenz-based regimen.
Infants in the lopinavir group had levels of the drug in their hair that measured 87 percent of the levels found in their mothers’ hair. The levels of ritonavir were about 45 percent of the levels found in their mothers’ hair. When the researchers looked at the drug levels in the blood drawn from the moms and infants at 12 weeks, they found the expected levels of lopinavir and ritonavir in the mothers, but none of either in the blood of the infants.
“The inability to find drug in the infants’ blood at 12 weeks tells us that the lopinavir and ritonavir in their hair is not due to recent exposure, so breast-feeding did not transfer these drugs to the infants. Our conclusion is that the lopinavir and ritonavir were transferred to the babies in the womb, and lopinavir at quite a high level,” stated Gandhi.
In the efavirenz group, researchers found infant drug levels in hair samples that were about 40 percent of the levels found in their mothers. Additionally, they found that infants had levels in their blood that were about 15 percent of what was found in their mothers.
These findings indicate a moderate transfer of efavirenz both in the womb and during breastfeeding stated Gandhi.
“Our findings, as we verify them, will have important implications. One, being able to measure drug exposures of fetuses in the womb and during breast-feeding can help us comprehend how to better protect infants from HIV transmission from HIV-positive moms during pregnancy, birth and after birth. Antiretroviral medications are delivered prophylactically to HIV-positive moms and newborns to prevent transmission, and fetuses derive protection from transmission if their HIV-positive moms are on an antiretroviral regimen,” she said.
“Second, the development of resistance to antiretroviral medications in infants is an important issue. HIV develops resistant mutations after fairly low levels of exposure to the class of medications to which efavirenz belongs, non-nucleoside transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Additionally, hair sampling for antiretroviral exposure levels will ultimately help us monitor toxicities associated with these medications in infants.”
Using hair to measure exposure to antiretrovirals has advantages in that it is a painless, bloodless, biohazard-free method of collecting a stable specimen from HIV patients. It measures drug exposure over time and has been shown to be more predictive of treatment response than the “snapshot” of exposure provided by a single plasma level of medication.
Gandhi stated that researchers are finding hair sampling to be a very useful tool in several settings. One use is in resource-limited settings where collecting, storing and handling blood draws is difficult and expensive. Hair is snipped, wrapped in foil and needs no refrigeration.
Another setting is in monitoring drug exposures in uninfected people. Researchers have been using the technique to measure adherence/drug levels in some of the pre-exposure prophylaxis trials, where high-risk uninfected patients take antiretrovirals to prevent getting infected with HIV. Non HIV-infected individuals can’t be monitored for adherence to antiretrovirals like HIV-infected individuals (where levels of HIV in the blood are measured routinely to indicate how well they are taking their pills) so hair levels provide a novel and reliable indicator of adherence.
A third setting is for monitoring prenatal exposures. Hair sampling is the only way currently to measure how much antiretroviral exposure fetuses are getting in the womb long-term. Cord blood measurements of antiretrovirals at birth, which are costly and cumbersome to collect, still only reflect exposure to the babies over the short-term. And collecting hair levels is a much easier technique for monitoring drug exposure levels in infants, especially when compared to blood draws.
This work was presented on July 21, 2012 during the 4th International Workshop on HIV Pediatrics, which takes in Washington, D.C. preceding the XIX International AIDS Conference.
Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:
Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:
The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).
Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.
- Existing Breast Cancer Drugs May Help More Women
- FDA: 2 More NECC Drugs Contaminated
- Virus Behavior Insight Offers Hope For New Drugs
- Insomnia, Anxiety Drugs May Raise Dementia Risk
- New Cancer Drugs Are Showing Great Promise
- Newer Drugs Help RA Patients Live Longer
- Teenage Girls Who Use Cannabinoid Drugs May, In The Future, Have Offspring With Increased Response To Opiate Drugs
- Device may inject a variety of drugs without using needles
- Study: Trash Old, Unused Drugs
- What Role Do Drugs Play in Determining Longevity?
Submited at Sunday, July 22nd, 2012 at 8:15 am on Uncategorized by jessica
Comment RSS 2.0 - leave a comment - trackback